Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Some other things that have not been answered:

Why are neither the family home nor their commercial property listed on tax forms as being their primary residence?

Why is the family home listed as the "office" of the Limited Liability Corporation that owns the commercial property?

Why, if the family is so quick to announce how much they earn each year in every interview they do, does the family refuse the Baltimore Sun's request to examine their tax return?

Hmmmmmm, makes me wonder why the Baltimore Sun is not being accused of "attacking a 12 year old boy"?

1 posted on 10/11/2007 11:19:38 AM PDT by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: icwhatudo

It’s not whether or not you lied about easily researched and collated facts, it’s the seriouness of the 12-year old.

MSM, you are the weakest link. Goodbye.


51 posted on 10/11/2007 1:16:53 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

After all this, we still don’t know who’s paying the tuition, despite the one report that it’s the grandparents. The combined $45K income is suspiciously low for a family living at that level - 3,000/sqft house, SUV, private school, etc. I’ll leave it at that.


53 posted on 10/11/2007 1:18:23 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

Well done. Don’t let the bastards get you down.


56 posted on 10/11/2007 1:23:56 PM PDT by Sloth (You being wrong & me being closed-minded are not mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo
Things that make us go Hmmmmmm.

Keep up the good work. Actual people calling themselves reporters and getting paid to report are not digging very deep. Can we say scratching the surface?

58 posted on 10/11/2007 1:37:12 PM PDT by auboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo
"I keep hearing how all my info was wrong, how it was all debunked as lies etc etc etc... but really there was only 1 major thing i was off on- the family paid a lower tuition amount at the exclusive Park school due to financial aid."

Is there any definite information as to exactly how much they pay?

59 posted on 10/11/2007 1:37:21 PM PDT by avacado (Republicans Destroyed Democrats' Most Cherished Institution: SLAVERY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

FABULOUS!!!! BRAVO!!!! You need to TEACH reporters just HOW to do their work!!!


65 posted on 10/11/2007 2:02:57 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her PHONINESS is REAL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

This man has found a hundred ways around the tax code. I suspect that an audit would find how he pays for cars, meal and entertainment has a way of helping the family too. It is very possible that supplies used in his company have also found their way into repairs or upgrades of his home. We are not talking about bringing home a couple of pencils.


70 posted on 10/11/2007 2:43:00 PM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo
BUMP

The left should not be allowed to leave the impression that these claims have been debunked so they can quickly sweep them under their very big and exceptionally dirty rug.

74 posted on 10/11/2007 3:22:15 PM PDT by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - President Fred D. Thompson /"The Constitution means what is says.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; cindy-true-supporter; ...

Maryland “Freak State” PING!


77 posted on 10/11/2007 3:28:29 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
I think debating the accident details is counterproductive, but maybe I’m missing the point. They certainly didn’t have the wreck on purpose and the children were severely injured. The rest is unimportant. It just looks petty to assign blame for the wreck at someone who has suffered such a tragedy, and I'm no bleeding heart. I see no connection to the S-CHIP/leech debate.

Keep focused on the issues of:
1. Their choice not to have health insurance means taxpayers now pay their medical bills.
2. Lifestyle supported by taxpayers.
2. Income/lifestyle not adding up.
4. Misrepresenting themselves as uninsured through work.
5. Details surrounding the private school. How can they afford or why did they get accepted/financial assistance? Back door dealing?
6. Their apparently wealthy families.

Expose them as gov't entitlement abusers and tax cheats if that is indeed what they are. The accident/injuries are only tangentially related to these issues. They put themselves in the public eye. They'd better lube up because here comes the microscope.

If kept in the news, hopefully it will become apparent to more of the common folk that the MSM is not doing their investigative job and is shilling for the dems, while attacking icwhatudo with vitriol.

Don't let them paint us as mean people attacking a tragic family or 12 year old although they'll surely try. The general public is very easily misdirected by the press.

81 posted on 10/11/2007 4:20:47 PM PDT by HundredDollars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
I think debating the accident details is counterproductive, but maybe I’m missing the point. They certainly didn’t have the wreck on purpose and the children were severely injured. The rest is unimportant. It just looks petty to assign blame for the wreck at someone who has suffered such a tragedy, and I'm no bleeding heart. I see no connection to the S-CHIP/leech debate.

Keep focused on the issues of:
1. Their choice not to have health insurance means taxpayers now pay their medical bills.
2. Lifestyle supported by taxpayers.
2. Income/lifestyle not adding up.
4. Misrepresenting themselves as uninsured through work.
5. Details surrounding the private school. How can they afford or why did they get accepted/financial assistance? Back door dealing?
6. Their apparently wealthy families.

Expose them as gov't entitlement abusers and tax cheats if that is indeed what they are. The accident/injuries are only tangentially related to these issues. They put themselves in the public eye. They'd better lube up because here comes the microscope.

If kept in the news, hopefully it will become apparent to more of the common folk that the MSM is not doing their investigative job and is shilling for the dems, while attacking icwhatudo with vitriol.

Don't let them paint us as mean people attacking a tragic family or 12 year old although they'll surely try. The general public is very easily misdirected by the press.

82 posted on 10/11/2007 4:21:15 PM PDT by HundredDollars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

I’m pretty impressed with the original investigation you did and equally so with this follow-up.

Our Lord’s Blessings and protection to you and your family.


83 posted on 10/11/2007 4:27:05 PM PDT by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo
I think you are being too generous on the tuition question. The Frosts have not said how much their pay for tuition. Michelle Malkin talked to the Frost's tenant at their commercial property, Reilly of Reilly Designs. He said he understood that the Grandparents pay the kids tuitions. I'd say, what they pay is still open.

Of course, it's the Frost's business what and how they pay, but if you are interested in your privacy, don't put your kid out to front a major party response to the President. You can have one, but not both.

85 posted on 10/11/2007 4:43:13 PM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Just laugh at them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo; hellinahandcart; Lil'freeper; big'ol_freeper

Thank you for what you’re doing.

You should’ve seen the tear jerker in the Blight for All yesterday about this.


87 posted on 10/11/2007 5:56:30 PM PDT by sauropod ("Nobody has time for your priceless prose. Get to the point." - Jim Michaels RIP 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

bump


91 posted on 10/11/2007 6:35:46 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (Dem-conomics 101: Overtax the productive and distribute to the wasteful. (ref: TFLABO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

Excellent job. These parnets made choices.


102 posted on 10/11/2007 8:01:52 PM PDT by dervish (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...

Halsey Frost And The Shameless Left
Riehlworldview.com | October 11, 2007 | Dan Riehl
Posted on 10/11/2007 4:18:59 PM PDT by khnyny
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1909980/posts


104 posted on 10/11/2007 9:18:32 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Friday, October 5, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

You’ve done some good work here my FRee State friend. These ninnies are simply attacking you because you’re altering their reality of facts.

My wife and I are independent business owners here in Maryland. We get dragged over the coals by our health insurance providers; paying about 12k a year for our family, then paying a pretty big hit on the deductibles each year, as well. It’s a pretty big chunk of our budget. I’d like to find a better plan, but I wouldn’t leave my family without some kind of provision for this. Forget “assailing” the kid how come the parents aren’t being taken to task for NOT insuring their family. It seems irresponsible to me.

We also send our children to a private school to the tune of 10k, I wouldn’t dare to leave my children in the public schools in our district. This is another big piece of the family budget, but it’s something that we value. If we could not afford it - and we are not wealthy by any means - we would have to homeschool.

This is what we choose to do. I don’t ask other individuals to pick up the tab for my kid and I don’t want to get stuck with the bill for your kid either. Nothing personal.

The folks that are attacking your post ought to do the “grown up” thing and take care of their own families. The Frosts should be taken to task for being so irresponsible, using their kid to shamelessly promote their political agenda, then defending that which is morally wrong once they are called on it. The father isn’t even man enough to take care of his own kids. He wants you and I to do it.

Wow! Being criticized for that has really got to hurt. Maybe not for a lib?

Thanks for your hard work. If you’re being attacked for your observations of the facts, take heart, you’re being attacked by all the right people; the liberal jackasses of the world.


106 posted on 10/12/2007 2:51:01 AM PDT by incredulous joe ("The floggings will continue until the general morale improves." - anon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo
Welcome to the jungle, baby!

:-)

I nominate Karen T. of Slime Magazine as the scumbag "reporter" of the year so far.

The competition is tough, though.

You have set a match under the media scam artists and their hysterical screams can be heard from sea to shining sea.

You might want to take a look at some of the "logical fallacy" web sites. They list a whole series of false arguments that are commonly used in the major media--the ad hominem attack, argument by authority, false premise, etc etc etc.

But when the lefties go totally nuts they fall back on Hillary's favorite technique--the naked threat.

"We will destroy you."

That is their ultimate argument--and their best one.

As I say, welcome to the jungle.
109 posted on 10/12/2007 4:03:06 AM PDT by cgbg ("I give you health care and I say 'no smoking'". "Yassah Miss Hillary.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo
100% true

And therein lies their problem...

111 posted on 10/12/2007 4:43:17 AM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
OSZAR »